Archive for July, 2013

Reflection: “The Boy in the Stripped Pajamas”

Friday, July 19th, 2013

I think feature films can add a lot to the understanding of the Holocaust. For my final project I will actually cover this topic and will be analyzing three films other films about the Holocaust, “Schindlers List,” “The Pianist,” and “Life is Good.” “The Boy in the Stripped Pajamas” is an interesting addition to this discussion.  Done in the right way, a film about the Holocaust can make a connection for the viewer. Instead of it being words on a page or black and white photos, a movie can create a realistic image of the Holocaust if done in the right manner. I would say that a film like “The Boy in the Stripped Pajamas” was a good representation. This film obviously had a very emotional ending and succeeded in humanizing the victims. One issue that I see with some Holocaust films is the same issue raised in Young’s lecture. Some Holocaust movies need to be careful not to just boil down Jewish identity only to that of being victims, or having the Holocaust being boiled down to just the number 6 million. Obviously, like we have learned in this class, the Holocaust was so much more than just that.

Virtual Visit to Memorials

Wednesday, July 17th, 2013

To answer the second part of the question first, I do think that certain memorials that we have studied so far can be more effective/ touching/ appropriate than others. Obviously, every memorial that we have looked at, is respectful and quite effective but personally I feel that a few in particular were the most effective and touching.

To me the best memorial came from Young’s lecture. Seeing how the Jews memorialize the Holocaust on Yam HaShoah in Israel was by far the most effective, touching, and appropriate memorial in my opinion. By having everyone stop and stand still, they themselves become living statues. This way of memorializing the Holocaust shows how far Jewish people have come since the Holocaust. Israel and Israeli’s themselves are the Holocaust memorial for the entire world.

I thought it was interesting when Young said that he worried that some memorials of the Holocaust might make a few people boil down Jewish identity solely to that of the Holocaust. I agree with this point to some degree. While every memorial whether It is a counter monument, a monument from Young’s lecture, the Topf &Sohne exhibition, even Auschwitz today all memorialize the Holocaust while trying to elicit a different emotion from people, they still bring the focus back to the historical event itself. This is another reason why I feel the Israeli tradition of Yam HaShoah is the best but also the most unique memorial. This memorial changes every year, it grows as the nation of Israel and the people of Israel continue to draw strength from their past rather than simply just remembering it. Screen-Shot-2013-04-09-at-11.18.52-AM

Reflection: Death Fugue

Friday, July 5th, 2013

Celan_

        In regards to the Androno quote where he argues that since culture gave birth to Auschwitz, to create any art based on that same culture is effectively denying what really happened in Auschwitz. He argues that poetry sort of be-little’s Auschwitz in a sense. The Holocaust is not just another atrocity, but it is an event that makes us questions the very point to the society, which gave birth to such an atrocity. While I agree in some regards to the point that Androno makes I think Celans poem “Death Fugue” is a good counterpoint. The fact that someone like Celan (who spent 18 months in a forced labor camp and whose parents died in a concentration camp) was able to come out of the holocaust and turned his experience into a piece of art shows the strength of the human spirit. This poem shows that we were able to win. The fact you can write poetry about such an atrocity gives society hope. Androno is belittling the strength of the Human spirit, while Celan and “Death Fugue” show its true resiliency.  This is one reason why I feel this poem is so significant to German literature.

Survivor Interview

Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013

            For this project I found the survivor interview of Max R. Garcia. He was born to working class conditions in 1924 in Amsterdam, Holland. He describes the fact that even though his family was Jewish, religion did not play a major role in their lives. They did not go to synagogue regularly. As a child in Amsterdam, Garcia describes that anti-Semitism was present. He describes life under Nazi occupation very vividly. Max Garcia was I think it is interesting that Garcia did not feel threatened by the Nazi’s until 2 years after the occupation of Holland began. In 1942 when the Jews had to be registered and he had to wear a yellow star as an 18 year old, he understood what was happening.  He was eventually taken to Auschwitz. He description of his time in the camp is nothing short of breathtaking. 

            There are many differences between the story of Max Garcia and Agate Nesaule. The main differencing being that their stories took place in different locations. Agate under soviet rule in Germany and Max under Nazi rule in Auschwitz, Poland. Also age is a major difference between the two. Max Garcia was much older than Agate Nesaule which gave him a very different perspective. While their perspectives were very different, I thought it was very interesting that both, Garcia and Nesuale mention a sense of non-feeling. At times they both cannot fully comprehend the horror that went on around them. Another similarity that is interesting to note is how their stories remained such an important part of their lives. Max mentions how he looks at his tattoo from Auschwitz every single day to remember what he has been through.

 

the interview of Max R. Garcia can be found here: http://tellingstories.org/holocaust/mgarcia/index.html

 

 

Survivor Interview

Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013

            For this project I found the survivor interview of Max R. Garcia. He was born to working class conditions in 1924 in Amsterdam, Holland. He describes the fact that even though his family was Jewish, religion did not play a major role in their lives. They did not go to synagogue regularly. As a child in Amsterdam, Garcia describes that anti-Semitism was present. He describes life under Nazi occupation very vividly. Max Garcia was I think it is interesting that Garcia did not feel threatened by the Nazi’s until 2 years after the occupation of Holland began. In 1942 when the Jews had to be registered and he had to wear a yellow star as an 18 year old, he understood what was happening.  He was eventually taken to Auschwitz. He description of his time in the camp is nothing short of breathtaking. 

            There are many differences between the story of Max Garcia and Agate Nesaule. The main differencing being that their stories took place in different locations. Agate under soviet rule in Germany and Max under Nazi rule in Auschwitz, Poland. Also age is a major difference between the two. Max Garcia was much older than Agate Nesaule which gave him a very different perspective. While their perspectives were very different, I thought it was very interesting that both, Garcia and Nesuale mention a sense of non-feeling. At times they both cannot fully comprehend the horror that went on around them. Another similarity that is interesting to note is how their stories remained such an important part of their lives. Max mentions how he looks at his tattoo from Auschwitz every single day to remember what he has been through.

 

the interview of Max R. Garcia can be found here: http://tellingstories.org/holocaust/mgarcia/index.html